• whocanitbe > INTHESUPREMECOURTOFBELIZEAD2007
  • INTHESUPREMECOURTOFBELIZEAD2007

    免费下载 下载该文档 文档格式:PDF   更新时间:2009-07-01   下载次数:0   点击次数:1
    文档基本属性
    文档语言:Simplified Chinese
    文档格式:pdf
    文档作者:微软用户
    关键词:
    主题:
    备注:
    点击这里显示更多文档属性
    1
    INTHESUPREMECOURTOFBELIZEA.D.2007 CLAIMNO.409OF2004
    (CYNTHIADAY ( BETWEEN(AND ( (RAFAELMARIN (DORITAMARIN
    CLAIMANT
    DEFENDANTS
    Coram:Hon.JusticeSirJohnMuria 21December2007 Ms.CynthiaPittsforClaimant Mr.KevinArthursfortheDefendants
    JUDGMENT
    MURIA,J.: Bytheirnoticeofapplicationdated28September2007andfiledon 2October2007,thedefendants,through their Attorneyat Law,appliedpursuant toRule26.3CPR,foranordertostrikeouttheclaimant'sclaiminthiscase.Two grounds are relied upon, namely, that the claim does not establish a sustainable claiminlaw,andsecondlythattheremedyclaimedisfrivolousandvexatious.
    In support of the application Mr. Kevin Arthurs of Counsel for the Defendants/Applicantsreliedontheaffidavitofthefirstdefendantsworntoon28
    2
    September2007and filedwiththeapplicationon2October2007.Insummary, theaffidavitofRafaelMarinstatedthattheclaimantwasanemployeeoftheCayo Institute of Cosmetology, the partners of which are Gaspar Alberto Aguilar, Stanley David Gibson and Rafael Marin who are all of Belize nationality. The claimant has never been a partner in the Cayo Institute of Cosmetology and thereforehasnolegalbasisforclaimingpartnershiprightinbusiness.
    Ms. Cynthia Pitts of Counsel for the Claimant/Respondent in response to the applicationsubmittedthatthecentralissueinthiscaseiswhethertheclaimantisa partnerornotinCayoInstituteofCosmetology.Hence,thequestion:whoarethe partners TheCourt mustdecidethat question,but itcanonlydosoatthetrial whenalltheevidenceisplacedbeforetheCourt.ThussubmittedCounsel,there is a cause of action in this case justifying the claimant's entitlement to seek remediesinthisCourt.
    StrikingOutClaim ThedefendantsrelyonRule26.3CPRinseekingtostrikeouttheclaimant'scase andentersummaryjudgmentagainsttheclaimant.Itshouldbepointedoutthat Rule 26.3 gives additional power to the Court to strike out statement of case
    3
    whereitisanabuseofprocessftheCourtordisclosesnoreasonablegroundsfor bringingtheclaimordefendingit.

    下一页

  • 下载地址 (推荐使用迅雷下载地址,速度快,支持断点续传)
  • 免费下载 PDF格式下载
  • 您可能感兴趣的
  • canit  whoyouwanttobe  whobe  whoyouwannabe  whocanitbe  whowebe  whowantstobe  whocantheonebe  whobelovingyou  bewho集团